At any rate - probably directly contradicting what I just said - I felt compelled to point out that there's a bit of a balance to be struck here in the aesthetics of conlanging. You can alter a conlang, or its writing system, to be less opaque in order to make it more easily decipherable to a reader, but on the other hand many natural languages don't bother to do that, so you could make the argument that a weird quirk that's consistent enough for the writing to be usable, but doesn't necessarily seem obvious to a reader, could give it more of a naturalistic feel.
1
)
1
1
1
